That does not answer the questions I asked. What you "believe" is not relevant. Tell me what you know is unscientific in my story.

The credibility isn't about the climatologists. The credibility I specify is about the validity of politicians. Did you miss that fact, Ray, or are you purposely redirecting to the wrong people? You are wrong about my subject.

What organization redacted the complete climatological data set? Is that what you say you trust?

The randomness of dice is still determinate, isn't it Ray? You can't dismiss the results based on randomness.

Opinions based on political belief are entertaining. Are you just an entertainer, Ray?